(assuming the indents are not lost in the bit bucket):
> Hello, Irene --
>
> Hahnemann however GAVE UP on complex diseases
>
> Really, do you think so? What basis have you for making such a claim?
It's not that *I* think so - *he* did, as I already quoted from the Organon - MUST you go in circles?
:-)
I'm afraid if you do not agree with what he wrote, you'll need to dig up his ghost to argue it with him directly. I'm not responsible for his published views.
>
> It's a matter of how you subdivide the system and its tissues and how you subdivide diseases and their separate effects.....
>
> Ah. Let's see the evidence for that hypothesis
It's no hypothesis, it's simple anatomy. Did you forget to study it?
> And, while you're about, it, if you have any evidence to offer that supports your contention that the dynamic derangements we know as illness may occupy entirely discrete tissues, then it would be very interesting to see it.
Did you forget to read the detailed example (of an actual case) which I presented in order for you to see just that? (The one contrasting FIP and HLH). Or was your knowledge of anatomical terminology insufficient to follow the example? Did you even realize it was an example?
I'll presume not, or you would not ask for evidence that was already supplied in sufficient detail to readily demonstrate the principle:-)
> Also highly helpful would be any shred of evidence to suggest that the unpredictability of synergistic and antergistic (okay, antagonistic, if we must) interactions has been overcome in a systematic, replicable manner:
That one's easy: Just read my paper describing over 500 cases with carefully matched remedies based of Law of Similars, in Nov 2009 issue of Hpathy:-)
Now before adding more hot air, DO supply YOUR studies and cases to show the contrary that YOU claim?
> Your usual response to the irrefutable being audacious point-blank denial,
The only irrefutable point I see is that you spout your version of theory with not a single case as evidence.
State your studies and cases to prove that YOUR interpretation of Hahnemann in the matter of the effective treatment of complex diseases, (not single diseases as you keep sending quotes about as if they were complex) is anything but hot air?
> I'll include those quotes for you again below. If one of them accidentally catches your eye
I do not work by "accident". I know what I am doing and why, before I do it.
It's why I am approached to work on the very complex cases for which I am known. I get asked to take all the ones that vets and others find impossible to help.
Show us your cases. When you've done that, we can continue the discussion as it takes understanding of real cases - complex ones at the very detail level - understanding the body and how it works, as well as the pathologies and how they work - plus the diseases as defined by homeopathic principles so as to know properly how to recognize which makes what symptom - to fully know how to USE homeopathy correctly for the diseases presenting. I speak of the cases Hahnemann claimed could not be cured (and any of the many more complex ones that have occurred subsequent to his time.)
I challenge you to provide even one case of YOURS - so we can see that you understand the interplay between anatomy, pathology, cause and effect and homeopathically relevant symptom discernment towards a simillimum for each of at least two diseases presenting as simultaneously active diseases in a complex.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen