>
> Hmm. You never miss a commercial opportunity, do you!
You are delusional now too?
> There seems to be a problem of communication here. If you see no inconsistency between Hahnemann's description of the complex of two diseases occupying different organs
It's different organs as long as you have enough anatomy knowledge to tell the difference between a neutrophilic granuloma of the tissues versus a Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis issue of the blood as it flows through the same organ. it is different tissues, different effects.
Likewise the immune "system" is really a few dozen subsystems - again if you bother to study your anatomy. So the aspects affecting IL-2 are different from the aspects affecting TNF-alpha.
read my email again in that context.
Hahnemann however GAVE UP on complex diseases and he knew nothing about cytokines or histiocytosis of the HLH kind or about Feline infectious peritonitis.
Medical science has grown.
So has homeopathy.
If you can't see it, it's not my problem.
Hahemann's PRINCIPLES hold - I am applying them - but you need to know your stuff to see it. It seems you do not.
> and your restatement of it as occupying the same ones
It's a matter of how you subdivide the system and its tissues and how you subdivide diseases and their separate effects. Clearly to me, Hahnemann understood those principles. If you do ot, well I am sorry, it'd also not my problem.
You'll just have to resort to rudeness and namecalling as is spparently your only "debating technique" when you run out of knowledge or understading.
> , then either somebody needs to be clearer about expressing it
I've trired,
> or somebody needs to think a little more.
Now you try.
> I don't think Hahnemann could have stated it more clearly, and neither could I, at least for the moment. I'm flummoxed.
Have you tried rescue remedy?
(It comes form a system inspired by homeoapthy, has five synergistic ingredirents all in one bottle, seems to be homeoapthically suited to your pathology/symptomology about mixtures?
> Untrained patients have no great difficulty in understanding homoeopathy's very few, very simple, but absolute requirements
Not the ones who come to me, unless I am mitaken in what Meow means:-)
It is I who know and apply the homeopathic priciples that help them get restored health.
> ; so it's of concern that somebody does who claims to practise it.
I DO practice it. With success.
It is you who do not do anyting but spout personal theory.
Or DO you practice it? You've been asked multiple times and are too afraid to answer.
(You mght need to add Mimulus and Aspen to the Rescue remedy.)
> In a nutshell, it would seem that, having dredged up from somewhere
Last time I saw a dredger, I was sailing past at double the knots. I did not get caught up on the stuff being dredged - must be a memeory of yours - it's not mine.
> this oxymoron "complex homoeopathy"
Not anoxymoron.
It's Hahnemann's idea that complex diseases exist and can be helped by homeopathy.
> , you have found the will to believe that it must exist and refer to the polypharmacy you insist is related to homoeopathy
Only you have suggested polypharmacy is in any way involved and you have failied to define it too; it is your delusion - not mine.
I decline to waste tin eon the rest of the hot air that follows.
It has no bearing on any aspect of the discussion.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen