homeopathy@homeolist.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
homeopathy-request@homeolist.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
homeopathy-owner@homeolist.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of homeopathy digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. National convention (Jack Anderson)
2. Robin Murphy and the Sankaran method (Jack Anderson)
3. LMs (Jack Anderson)
4. Re: Robin Murphy and the Sankaran method (John Summerville)
5. Re: LMs (Irene de Villiers)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:24:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Jack Anderson <japala50@yahoo.com>
Subject: [H] National convention
To: homeopathy@homeolist.com
Message-ID: <732308.94227.qm@web114517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
Is there currently a national convention being held
annually for homeopaths with numerous speakers
and workshops?
Jack
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:25:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Jack Anderson <japala50@yahoo.com>
Subject: [H] Robin Murphy and the Sankaran method
To: homeopathy@homeolist.com
Message-ID: <54983.89359.qm@web114510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
Has anyone heard of Dr. Robin Murphy's point of view
on the Sankaran method?
Jack
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:28:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Jack Anderson <japala50@yahoo.com>
Subject: [H] LMs
To: homeopathy@homeolist.com
Message-ID: <470441.11839.qm@web114508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
What is the current estimate of the percentage of
US homeopaths that have switched to an LM practice?
Does anyone on the list have five years or more of
experience with full time use of LMs in their practice?
Do you see superior results?
Jack
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:13:25 +1300
From: John Summerville <jefree@paradise.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [H] Robin Murphy and the Sankaran method
To: Homlist <Homeopathy@homeolist.com>
Message-ID: <65B8BB91-BE47-4E10-BC00-D45E22A5FFC2@paradise.net.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Been watching this thread for a while. What is being lost sight of is
the fact that the practice of homeopathy requires knowledge of it's
philosophy (the organon), its laws, similars, minimum dose,
potenisation, Hering's Law, etc. Requires materia medica. It also
requires case taking, the art of recognising what needs to be cured,
where the center of the case is or whether it is a one sided case that
needs a small remedy. When it comes to the analysis of the case, then
you might look at totality, a small modality, a peculiar, or Scholten,
Sankaran, Klein, Boeninghausen or whoever it may be. Sankaran, Murphy
et al just offer tools to get into a case that the practitioner may
use or not, depending what he sees in front of him. A good
practitioner should be aware of all these different tools and use the
appropriate one at the appropriate time. The art of homeopathy is the
same in all cases, there is no short cut or better way, the knowledge
requires work and study, the analysis requires tools and understanding
which together make the art and efficacy of our healing system
On 24/02/2011, at 12:25 PM, Jack Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Has anyone heard of Dr. Robin Murphy's point of view
> on the Sankaran method?
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homeopathy Mailing List
> homeopathy@homeolist.com
> http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:31:23 -0800
From: Irene de Villiers <furryboots@icehouse.net>
Subject: Re: [H] LMs
To: homeo list <homeopathy@homeolist.com>
Message-ID: <2BA53EEF-054E-4AB0-9A55-3E81E650AC22@icehouse.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
On Feb 23, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Jack Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> What is the current estimate of the percentage of
> US homeopaths that have switched to an LM practice?
In my opinion LMs are out of date.
They were the last eperiments by Hahnemann in his attempts -
different in every edition of the Organon - to find an ideal system
of potency - which he never did. ... Hence his swapping around from
LMs to C's and back or using both - till his death.
However, since then the Fibonacci series of potencies has been
developed and DOES fit the laws of Nature. I have used these
exclusively since they became known and available in 2009.
It is a matter of time before ALL homeopaths see the logic, the
natural sense and the efficacy and safety of this far more logical
potency series.
That said one could in theory use LMs in F series - or any chosen
potency in F series....it is the F series that matters, not the X, C,
LM, etc aspect.
But the C potencies in series are the ones most studied and proved.
Using Fibonacci series (eg 5C, 8C, 13C, 21C, 34C, 55C, 89C, 144C,
233C...) causes each potency to build on the others with GREAT
efficacy. Anyone who has not read up on it yet is urged to do so.
It is a major step forward and takes all the puzzlement out of
potency selection.
> Does anyone on the list have five years or more of
> experience with full time use of LMs in their practice?
> Do you see superior results?
I saw INferior results in severe chronic cases - the ones where I
specialize. It did not work FAST enough for some cases, and if
"pushed", it aggravated. Ordinary C potencies did not go deep enough
for those cases without aggravation.
I see superior results with C potencies in F series. They go deep and
do not aggravate if used correctly.
The book on this with explanations and case studies is:
"The Potency" by Dr Joe Rozencwajg, NMD. See Lulu.com under his name.
You can also read the difference between ordinary potency and F
series in my paper in Hpathy, Nov 2009, explaining what a difference
it made in my work on FIP disease:
<http://hpathy.com/veterinary-homeopathy/articles/feline-infectious-
peritonitis-fip-case-management-and-suggested-new-rubrics-developed-
from-500-cases/>
OR short link:
http://www.tinyurl.com/IreneNov2009FIP
So far, whoever tries the F series, starts using them exclusively. No
point doing anything else.
I predict everyone will eventually be using them. It just takes time
to get used to something new to us. It is really the answer though
being based on nature - as is the Law of similars. We never had
potency based on laws of nature before:-) I suspect that's why
Hahnemann struggled and kept changing and looking for a better
option........... we have it now.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
End of homeopathy Digest, Vol 11, Issue 23
******************************************
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen