I'd suggest that it's likely to be at least a month, and not unlikely
several months, before you can begin to feel secure in the knowledge that
the symptoms you're experiencing are purely your own.
As long as you give it enough time, there's probably no damage done, and you
may even be permanently minus a few symptoms. (If so, that won't do your
next homoeopath any favours: the fuller your medical history, the easier a
basis it forms for prescription. The most difficult kind of case for a
homoeopath is a case with few evident symptoms. But perhaps you can use the
time doubly productively, by noting down the old symptoms that have
disappeared in addition to your emerging state of health as well as giving
your system time to get itself in order.)
Prescribing on changing symptoms in a chronic case is generally a mistake
unless the changeability is merely part of the stable state. Partly this is
because you can't tell whether the change that follows was going to occur
anyway. Partly it's because your system is not yet ready to respond
coherently, as it's already responding to something else. So the best thing
you can do for your health -- assuming you don't fall ill in the meantime --
is to have the patience to wait the changes out while you live a stable,
relaxed, healthy lifestyle, and to consult your (next) homoeopath only once
you know with certainty that you're no longer under the influence of
medicines.
Don't panic. It's difficult to do permanent damage with homoeopathy unless
you set out to suppress symptoms regardless of the effect on the patient.
It may take some time for the natural state to reassert itself, but, from
what you say, there's no suggestion that you lack the energy to do that, and
there's every suggestion that your health will stabilise given a bit of
time. And that time is not time lost; it's certainty gained.
Once you do talk to a homoeopath, you could ask for an explanation of his or
her approach to working out what has occurred following the first medicine.
You could, for instance, ask how many doses you're likely to take before a
follow-up consultation, what the various kinds of possible responses are to
the first medicine, when the response will be evident, and how the
homoeopath would respond to each kind of possible response. If you find, in
his or her answer, that the homoeopath either does not care to check your
response before suggesting you take a second dose; does not have the
security to wait for a few weeks before doing so; of has only two responses
-- keep going or look for another medicine -- then you can guess that you're
not in good hands.
But I'd suggest that you approach these questions with a degree of good
faith, treating them not as a test but as a confirmation that the person who
appears to know what he or she is doing is going to make a commitment to the
quality of treatment you're expecting he or she will provide. That's not a
commitment to achieving any certain outcome but a commitment to taking the
care about it that you've come to understand you can expect of a
conscientious homoeopath.
Does that sound workable to you?
Kind regards --
John
On 3 August 2011 12:44, <homeolist@otherhealth.com> wrote:
>
> so then ill try to stay off of all remedies for at least 15
> days............thats about 2 weeks that should give some idea yes?
>
> also........if any benefits ive gained were fake and i was to relapse
> back to my old state.............would this happen within 15 days?
>
>
> --
> brokengirl
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> brokengirl's Profile: http://www.otherhealth.com/member.php?userid=13824
> View this thread: http://www.otherhealth.com/showthread.php?t=11636
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homeopathy Mailing List
> homeopathy@homeolist.com
> http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"EFSA… indicated (p. S60) that 'to detect effects on reproduction or
development [...] testing of the whole food and feed beyond a 90-day rodent
feeding study may be needed'. We fully agree with these assumptions. This
is why we think that in order to protect large populations from unintended
effects of novel food or feed, imported or cultivated crops on a large
scale, chronic 2-year and reproductive and developmental tests are crucial.
However, they have never been requested by EFSA for commercial edible
crops. We therefore wish to underline that in contrast with the statements
of EFSA, all commercialized GMOs have indeed been released without such
tests being carried out…"
—Gilles-Eric Séralini, Robin Mesnage, Emilie Clair, et al., "Genetically
modified crops safety assessments: present limits and possible
improvements", *Environmental Sciences Europe* 2011; 23:10, <
http://dx.doi.or/10.1186/2190-4715-23-10>, <
http://www.enveurope.com/content/23/1/10>
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen