Re: [H] Combos and complexes

True. But the question of whether the essential nature of homoeopathy has
changed is not the same question as whether the same thing you've always
done is the best you can do, is it. You can see, I hope, that the answers
to them don't depend at all on each other. So why do you and Shannon and
the other polypharmacists keep attempting to answer the former question by
answering the latter? Are you really incapable of drawing any distinction
between the two?

John

On 9 January 2012 21:57, Irene de Villiers <furryboots@icehouse.net> wrote:

>
> On Jan 8, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>
> >
> > Any art I can think of, or any science I can
> > think of--where discoveries, inspirations and strokes of genius etc.
> > are viewed not as *defining* and delimiting the study, but instead as
> > bases for going yet further and achieving yet more?
>
> Makes perfect sense.
>
> If you always do what you always did, then you will always get what you
> always got
> - namely no progress.
>
> Namaste,
> Irene
>
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy