Re: [H] [Minutus] Ducking now [was: Re: Erb and/or Erb-c - 2

On Jan 8, 2012, at 11:11 PM, John Harvey wrote:

>
> Shannon, YOU raised the analogy with art as defined by Rembrandt's
> brushstrokes --

Ah, so that's the misreading you followed... No I didn't.
What I wrote was: " The art of Rembrandt does not define "art"; and
the physics of Newton does not define physics."

> [snip a bunch of insults] ... that if homoeopathy means what
> Hahnemann said it means, then it must also mean following his every
> direction as to how best to practise it.
>
> You can see, can't you, that the second does NOT follow from the
> first?

Well, I *had* thought that was the basis of your (et al) arguments
about not-homeopathy.
If not that, then what?

> And you know very well, don't you, that nobody (least of all I)
> claims that homoeopathy practised in any way that departs from
> Hahnemann's particular directions is not homoeopathy. ...

That assertion has certainly been made on this list in the past.
Sorry if I was mistaken in believing you were one who had made it.
Shannon
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy