John
On 3 August 2011 09:15, <homeolist@otherhealth.com> wrote:
>
> John, you've made an excellent point.
>
>
> --
> sreischman
>
> Shirley Reischman
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> sreischman's Profile: http://www.otherhealth.com/member.php?userid=3128
> View this thread: http://www.otherhealth.com/showthread.php?t=11636
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homeopathy Mailing List
> homeopathy@homeolist.com
> http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"EFSA… indicated (p. S60) that 'to detect effects on reproduction or
development [...] testing of the whole food and feed beyond a 90-day rodent
feeding study may be needed'. We fully agree with these assumptions. This
is why we think that in order to protect large populations from unintended
effects of novel food or feed, imported or cultivated crops on a large
scale, chronic 2-year and reproductive and developmental tests are crucial.
However, they have never been requested by EFSA for commercial edible
crops. We therefore wish to underline that in contrast with the statements
of EFSA, all commercialized GMOs have indeed been released without such
tests being carried out…"
—Gilles-Eric Séralini, Robin Mesnage, Emilie Clair, et al., "Genetically
modified crops safety assessments: present limits and possible
improvements", *Environmental Sciences Europe* 2011; 23:10, <
http://dx.doi.or/10.1186/2190-4715-23-10>, <
http://www.enveurope.com/content/23/1/10>
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen