Re: [H] Brazil's "Scientific American" fabulous article on homeopathy!

Susan, while your progress will be meaningful to those who actually
*want* to know "whether homeopathy works", that's not true of these
folks -- at least not Randi, I don't know about the other guy.
Thinking of that phrase, "None are so blind, as those who will not
(refuse to) see."

:-/
Shannon

On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:08 PM, healthyinfo6@aol.com wrote:

>
> Most disturbing is the heavy anti-homeopathy propaganda on the SBM
> website!
>
> Most recently attacking Boiron and Marino Center in Cambridge, MA,
> an alt-health multi-discipline practice.
>
> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/category/homeopathy/
>
> Now they're promoting Randi's new e-books that will reprint old anti-
> homeopathy German musings from Hahnemann's time by Oliver Wendell
> Holmes and this blog author previews the preface they were asked to
> write for it by the Randi's org, JREF.
>
> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/homeopathy-and-its-kindred-delusions/
>
> It's a shame my current homeopathic "cure" for inherited bipolar
> would be laughed off by these quackbusters as delusional.
> Don't like using term quackbusters since one of them, Dr. Novella,
> is an MD teaching at Yale University, his videos listed from the Dr.
> Oz show as he's the alternative health segment antagonist vs. a more
> complementary MD protagonist.
>
> Hopefully, my upcoming cure for diabetes will convince them! It
> will be a while though.
>
> Surely, discussing using 200C anti-miasmatics and LM anti-psorics,
> alternatively to achieve cure, would be beyond their comprehension
> as it's difficult enough for some practicing homeopaths to grasp.
>
> Susan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carol Boyce <carolboyce@earthlink.net>
> To: Dana Ullman, MPH <dullman@igc.org>; Homeopathy <homeopathy@homeolist.com
> >
> Sent: Tue, Apr 3, 2012 1:11 pm
> Subject: Re: [H] Brazil's "Scientific American" fabulous article on
> homeopathy!
>
>
> Hi Dana,
> Hope all is well with you.
> Thanks for this but am confused - was this actually an article - the
> ranslation doesn't read like an article in Scientific American might
> ead - it reads at best more like a letter to the editor? Which
> ould also be good - but until I can be sure I don't want to put it
> ut there. I can't seem to track it back to source beyond
> ciencebasedmedicine.org?
> Do you have any info that might help?
> Thanks a lot,
> Carol
>
> t 7:09 AM -0700 4/3/12, Dana Ullman, MPH wrote:
> Friends,
>
> Fabulous news! Brazil's edition of SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN just
> published a very positive story that declares homeopathy
> indispensable to plant health and human health!
> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/scientific-american-declares-homeopathy-indispensable-to-planet-and-human-health/
>>
> -- please ignore the comments of the skeptic (aka "medical
> fundamentalist" and "denier" who wrote about this great article.
>
>
> Dana Ullman, MPH
> www.homeopathic.com (website)
> www.Huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullman (blog)
> _______________________________________________
> Homeopathy Mailing List
> homeopathy@homeolist.com
> http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
>
> -
> f your reply to this email bounces back, or you don't receive a
> eply within 48 hours, it means Earthlink has decided not to
> o-operate.
> pologies. Please resend your email to: somethingtosay2007 at
> mail.com and Google will pass it on to me. Thanks!
> ______________________________________________
> omeopathy Mailing List
> omeopathy@homeolist.com
> ttp://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homeopathy Mailing List
> homeopathy@homeolist.com
> http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy

_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy