Re: [H] STeve Jobs

>
> On Dec 22, 2011, at 5:37 AM, Jeremycrowley wrote:
>
>>
>> Someone attacks Homeopathy so we immediately start attacking each
>> other! There is no hope for us.

Not true, you have misrepresented the situation.
The discussion has not been about people, and nobody was attacked.
The discussion has been about the misnaming of combos as homeopathy when they are not homeopathy.

People who invent combos should think up their own name for their experimental mixtures.
The only "attack" is against the fraudulent use of the term "homeopathy" to describe mixtures, which have no provings to show what they may be able to do in advance of their use, by the Law of Siilars.
Such provings are required for anythig to be considered homeopathy.
So the discussion is merely about misuse of the *name* of a well defined system, for fraudulent commercial gain.

What combos do or do not actually do - would be a separate discussion - this one was only about their misnaming as homeopathy.

>> I haven't read many of the posts and don't intend to either

Perhaps then, you are not in a position to criticize, with respect.

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy