Obviously interesting claims for him to make, and it would seem he has more information about Jobs than you (us) - or he thinks he has.
Conventional Medicine (ConMed) kills people directly through taking Big Pharma drugs. ConMed is now the biggest single killer in USA, and probably elsewhere.
Jobs wasn't 'killed' by any homeopathic treatment. If he delayed ConMed treatment, Ernst's argument is that this treatment is so good, so life-saving, so safe (et al) that the delay (caused by homeopathy) killed him. In other words, Job should not have the right to choose how he was treated, and that he should not have been allowed to delay ConMed treatment.
But let us not even assume it was homeopathy! Who did he see, or consult with? Did he do so by choice? Did he get good advice? Was he properly informed about his choices, and options?
This is just another attack on homeopathy, and one that we can expect to be used ad nauseam for the next few years.
Steve Scrutton
Director, Alliance of Registered Homeopaths
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen