*would* make up combos for their patients to use, in between visits,
for those acutes that the patient or family were prone to.
This would be an example of what you are saying.
In the case of off-the-shelf remedies, of course the "patient" is
attempting to match their own symptoms to those listed in the package
insert (or, as in Rosemary's case, to what they know about the
included remedies).
But, um, how can A be similar to B, but B not be similar to A? I
understand what you are saying in terms of the *process* we go through
in matching patient and remedy, but in context I think this is getting
nitpicky to the point of meaninglessness. In any case of *course* the
search begins with the symptoms of the patient--why else are they
looking for a remedy???????
On Dec 19, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Irene de Villiers wrote:
>
> On Dec 19, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>
>> But as to the law of similars, that will have been used to arrive at
>> the *choices* of remedies included.
>
> Not possible....
> Law of Similars says the symptoms of the PATIENT must be similar to
> the symptoms of the remedy.
>
> With a mix, there is no patient - hence no law of similars involved.
>
> ..........Irene
> --
> Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
> P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
> www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
> "Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homeopathy Mailing List
> homeopathy@homeolist.com
> http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen