as they don't confront you with the simple requirement to compare knowledge
of the medicine's pathogenesis with knowledge of the patient's derangement,
with all that that requirement entails. Once we reach such a point in the
endless jackrabitting, you invariably find yourself too short of time to
respond. It's amazing.
When you do have time to dip back into discussion, a simple,
*relevant*response to my last post, under the subject line Penicillin,
would be
helpful. Thanks, Shannon, and I wish you a thoughtful holiday.
John
On 19 December 2011 13:19, Shannon Nelson <shannonnelson@tds.net> wrote:
> Oooooooh sorry, too much of going back over old ground.
>
> Sorry, i can't chase this tail any further right now...
> We are heading into the holiday season, and I have other tales to chase!
> So you can have the last word again, take my toll on this fine tale.
> Enjoy!
>
> Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays of Every Stripe, to all.
>
> :o)
> Shannon
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2011, at 8:11 PM, John Harvey wrote:
>
> >
> > Shannon, there's just one thing that homoeopathic practice requires
> > absolutely: understanding and acknowledging that homoeopathic method
> > has an inviolable principle.
> >
> > To avoid confronting that principle by discussions of labelling
> > people as being homoeopaths or not being homoeopaths advances the
> > conversation not one iota.
> >
> > If you can acknowledge that every prescription made using
> > homoeopathic method must use that principle as its basis, then you
> > understand something of what it is to practise homoeopathy. If not,
> > then you don't.
>
--
"And if care became the ethical basis of citizenship? Our parliaments,
guided by such ideas, would be very different places."
—Paul Ginsborg, *Democracy: Crisis and Renewal*, London: Profile, 2008.
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen