>
>
> > Jamie, the "match" Shannon is talking about is no more than a single
> > symptom in common!
>
> Argh, YOU keep saying that; I never did.
>
> If you've suggested that there's any higher standard in cooking up
> "combos", I'm afraid I've overlooked it.
You are repeatedly overlooking a *lot* of what I say, which is part of
my frustration.
Gotta run for a bit. Have fun, all! :o)
>
>
>
> Your issue is that any combination falls outside the realm of
> "homeopathy." Correct?
> Then why keep muddying the issue?
> At least let's take them *one at a time*!
>
> I think you're suggesting that if each medicine in a mixture doesn't
> have a symptom in common with the patient, that that raises a
> separate issue from a mixture in which it does. My contention is
> that the distinction is entirely artificial: every medicine will
> most likely have a single symptom in common with the patient.
>
> The significance of the symptom in common is therefore zilch.
>
> John
>
> --
>
> "And if care became the ethical basis of citizenship? Our
> parliaments, guided by such ideas, would be very different places."
>
> —Paul Ginsborg, Democracy: Crisis and Renewal, London: Profile, 2008.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen