Re: [H] Did homeopathy kill Steve Jobs, founder of Apple

Please unsubscribe to this mail list,
I am getting numerous emails from all people posting, it is not
digested anymore, and there is no way for me to log in anymore and
change my settings. I tried but did not work.
Please unsubscribe, I will sign up again when this problem is
straightened out.

Deborah
On Dec 17, 2011, at 9:06 PM, Shannon Nelson wrote:

> Okay, good luck with that.
>
> Start the petitions going around, and I'll sign.
>
> In the mean time I'll stick with using modifiers such as "classical,"
> just as most of the rest of the country is doing. To each his own...
>
>
>
> On Dec 17, 2011, at 7:51 PM, John Harvey wrote:
>
>>
>> Shannon, you've asked this many times before, at just this point in
>> the conversation, and I recall your question receiving interesting
>> answers that it might be instructive for you to consult; but let me
>> have a go at answering the question.
>>
>> All of us are in charge of getting the word "homoeopathic" off
>> bottles of mixtures. It shouldn't be that hard to achieve, with a
>> bit of an effort. In Australia at least, homoeopathy is accurately
>> defined in legislation; as a result, it's technically illegal to
>> label mixtures as being potentially homoeopathic. If the practice
>> occurs nevertheless (and I've no doubt it does), then it's due to
>> our slackness in calling for the law to be enforced and our
>> tolerance of charlatans who refer to such mixtures as homoeopathic
>> on our own homoeopathy lists.
>>
>> The discrepancy between fact and label claim seems to be your most
>> consistent bugbear. Perhaps you'd make an energetic and effective
>> leader in the campaign in your own country to have inaccurate
>> "homoeopathic" labelling removed.
>>
>> As for "other places", the responsibility for not misleading people
>> as to what homoeopathy is and what it is not lies with each one of
>> us. Anybody who maintains that the meaning of homoeopathy now
>> includes polypharmacy or any other practice that violates the
>> homoeopathic principle (remember: symptom similarity, without a
>> substitute in clinical "success") exacerbates the fundamental
>> misrepresentation. To claim that homoeopathy can include
>> polypharmacy is not slack, ignorant, or cute; it's simply a lie, and
>> an unoriginal one oft disproven.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18 December 2011 11:55, Shannon Nelson <shannonnelson@tds.net>
>> wrote:
>> Cool, then we're golden.
>> So who's in charge of getting the word off all those bottles of combo
>> remedies?
>> Not to mention the many other places it's been in use for lo these
>> many years.
>>
>> --
>>
>> "And if care became the ethical basis of citizenship? Our
>> parliaments, guided by such ideas, would be very different places."
>>
>> —Paul Ginsborg, Democracy: Crisis and Renewal, London: Profile, 2008.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homeopathy Mailing List
> homeopathy@homeolist.com
> http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy

_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy