Re: [H] Did homeopathy kill Steve Jobs, founder of Apple

Shannon, there's just one thing that homoeopathic practice requires
absolutely: understanding and acknowledging that homoeopathic method has an
inviolable principle.

To avoid confronting that principle by discussions of labelling people as
being homoeopaths or not being homoeopaths advances the conversation not
one iota.

If you can acknowledge that every prescription made using homoeopathic
method must use that principle as its basis, then you understand something
of what it is to practise homoeopathy. If not, then you don't.

The principle is unsurpassable in its simplicity. It needs no substitute;
it needs no complication.

The principle's implications are equally straightforward to anybody with a
working mind. One of these is that, without a known pathogenesis, no
medicine can be compared with the patient's state of derangement.

And one of the implications of that is that no mixture, no "combo", no
polypharmacy, is possible within homoeopathic method.

It's really rather simple when you cease chasing your tail.

John

On 19 December 2011 00:10, Shannon Nelson <shannonnelson@tds.net> wrote:

> "As far as i ca tell, it is drug companies and mixologists.. "
>
> Standard is one that makes both singles and combos, and of course the
> world is filled with people who think in terms of "different kinds of
> homeopathy." But anyway, fight the good fight...
>
> Or we cld work on educating people about the differing uses and track
> records of the "different types of homeopathy"...

--

"And if care became the ethical basis of citizenship? Our parliaments,
guided by such ideas, would be very different places."

—Paul Ginsborg, *Democracy: Crisis and Renewal*, London: Profile, 2008.
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy