John
On 23 December 2011 11:54, John Harvey <john.p.harvey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Joe --
>
> Let me offer you thanks for the reasoning you've described here. This
> approach sounds at least thoughtful. It is apparently *homoeopathic*only transiently and superficially, but that's neither here nor there (as I
> don't think you're claiming it to enter into homoeopathy at all); the
> interesting thing is to know how it's done and why.
>
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen