No, it mightn't be churlish to suggest that.
But to do so without also acknowledging the irrelevancy of your own
previous contributions even to the topic at hand -- let alone to the mighty
quest to unseat multinational banks -- would be.
Kind regards,
John
On 23 December 2011 02:45, Wendy Howard <wendy@smeddum.net> wrote:
> On 22 Dec 2011, at 04:44, Celia M. Malm wrote:
>
> > As long as homeopaths waste all their energy fighting among themselves
> over
> > Organon editions and combination remedies, the manufacturers of these
> kinds
> > of products will continue to go unchallenged, deceiving the public about
> > homeopathy a thousand times worse than any Boiron combo could ever do
> (and
> > no, I'm not a combo user or supporter). Worrying about combos when the
> real
> > PR damage from fraud is occurring elsewhere is like trimming your
> toenails
> > when your hair is on fire.
>
> Lovely analogy!! Would it be churlish though if I venture to suggest that
> worrying about dodgy uses of the term 'homeopathic' while our governments
> are busy legislating away our rights and freedoms and the banks and
> multinational corporations are between them bringing the global economy to
> the verge of collapse and severely compromising the ability of the planet
> to sustain life as we know it falls into much the same category? :-)
>
> Wendy
--
"And if care became the ethical basis of citizenship? Our parliaments,
guided by such ideas, would be very different places."
—Paul Ginsborg, *Democracy: Crisis and Renewal*, London: Profile, 2008.
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen