Re: [H] Combos vs. Singles

On Dec 19, 2011, at 9:01 AM, John Harvey wrote:

> Good point. It's always the patient who's overlooked in this kind of
> prescribing (setting aside something like Rosemary's experience, in
> which
> the effort had been made to find a single medicine).

Ummmmmm......... you're bringing a heckuva lot of assumptions to this
statement!
Which, again, are muddying the waters by mixing multiple issues that
are not necessarily that related to the core questions.

So in Rosemary's case it was still not-homeopathy, because there were
other remedies there,
Or was it homeopathy because she had actually done the work to
properly identify the needed remedy?

>
> John
>
> On 20 December 2011 01:31, Irene de Villiers
> <furryboots@icehouse.net>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>>
>>> But as to the law of similars, that will have been used to arrive at
>>> the *choices* of remedies included.
>>
>> Not possible....
>> Law of Similars says the symptoms of the PATIENT must be similar to
>> the
>> symptoms of the remedy.
>>
>> With a mix, there is no patient - hence no law of similars involved.
>
>
> --
>
>
> "And if care became the ethical basis of citizenship? Our
> parliaments,
> guided by such ideas, would be very different places."
>
>
> —Paul Ginsborg, *Democracy: Crisis and Renewal*, London: Profile,
> 2008.
> _______________________________________________
> Homeopathy Mailing List
> homeopathy@homeolist.com
> http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy

_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy