> Sorry, I had no idea that combos had been proved, I thought only the
> individual parts had been proved, but as stated that is no guide as
> to the MM of the parts in combination
> Please direct me to the provings of the combos as a unit and as
> sold, I look forward to studying their pathogenesis, assuming the
> provings are trustworthy!!
? Who said anything about that?
Oh right, you are assuming that the actions of individual remedies
within a combination will be entirely different from and unrelated to
their actions individually.
Experience shows this not to be the case, tho there are caveats to be
made. (I.e. not all remedies will be reasonable to combine with each
other; sometimes they will affect each other, etc.) Too big a topic
for me to go into--and not one I am well versed in.
Regards,
Shannon
> Happy Christmas everyone
> With best wishes from
>
> Jamie
>
> PS John, had no idea about the theatrical story of Herings
> depression (what was the play?!)
>
>
>
> On 19/12/2011 12:55, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2011, at 6:34 AM, Jamie Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> How can you prescribe something of which you have no idea what its
>>> pathogenesis is?
>>
>> Jamie, who has done or advocated that?
>> Even in the rankest of combo usage, there is a match being
>> considered between pathogenesis (aka "the remedy picture") and the
>> case at hand.
>>
>>
>>
> <jamie_taylor.vcf>
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen