intolerance and censorship can disguise themselves as calls for unity, and
that the one principle that binds all homoeopaths may be ignored with
impunity by anybody who conveniently mistakes distinction, or definition,
for intolerance and censorship.
We've learnt that those with the most to lose in the declaration of
homoeopathy's sole difference from all varieties of allopathy bluster
hardest about the valuelessness of the discussion.
And we've learnt that the disguise, the confusion, and the bluster are much
of a muchness in value and sincerity.
And what have you done lately?
Kind regards,
John
On 22 December 2011 22:37, Jeremycrowley <jeremycrowley@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Someone attacks Homeopathy so we immediately start attacking each other!
> There is no hope for us.
>
> I haven't read many of the posts and don't intend to either as I can guese
> what people will be saying, and no I am not claiming to be psychic, just
> read it all before.
>
> Just wrote this to exercise my other fingers while I give my deleting
> finger a well earned rest.
>
> Sorry about exercising your deleting finger, I doubt if I will be
> bothering you again, I will probably be leaving the group. I cannot
> remember when I last learnt anything useful on this list.
>
> Perhaps I Blinked and Missed it. Has anyone learned anything useful here?
>
>
> Jeremy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homeopathy Mailing List
> homeopathy@homeolist.com
> http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
>
--
"And if care became the ethical basis of citizenship? Our parliaments,
guided by such ideas, would be very different places."
—Paul Ginsborg, *Democracy: Crisis and Renewal*, London: Profile, 2008.
_______________________________________________
Homeopathy Mailing List
homeopathy@homeolist.com
http://lists.homeolist.com/mailman/listinfo/homeopathy
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen